Friday, January 10, 2025

Dealing with Piracy (041409) by J. F. Kelly, Jr.

A commentary by J. F. Kelly, Jr. An overused media commentary during the standoff between the U.S. Navy and the Somali pirates holding Captain Richard Phillips, master of the container ship Maersk Alabama, in one of his vessel’s lifeboats, was that it demonstrated the limits of the world’s mightiest Navy. It did nothing of the sort, as subsequent events demonstrated. Rather, it demonstrated the versatility of naval forces and the wisdom of leaving decisions regarding the timing and application of force to the on-scene commander, once the use of force has been authorized by higher authority. Another popular misconception unfortunately shared by some in the military and in the highest levels of government is that piracy is a criminal act perpetrated by lawless thugs who must be captured and “brought to justice.” They caution against relying on military solutions and argue that only by engaging in nation building in Somalia can the piracy issue be solved. The youthful pirates are desperate to make a living. It is, they believe, primarily a law enforcement issue. Here we go again. What law enforcement agency, with the possible exception of the over-extended U.S. Coast Guard, has the expertise to deal with law enforcement on the high seas? The FBI? The argument that the protection of U.S. flag vessels in international waters or while engaged in innocent passage is not a valid mission for the U.S. Navy, over-extended or not, is a flawed argument. It is, in fact, a counterproductive argument for a smaller navy. The magnitude of the piracy problem demonstrates, rather, that we have insufficient numbers of ships. The fleet is at its lowest numerical level since the Great Depression. As capable as these ships are, they can only be in one place at a time. Obviously, larger, more aggressive naval forces are not the only solution to this scourge. The standoff also demonstrated the stubborn refusal of the companies operating merchant ships to allow the crews to defend themselves and their ships against piracy on the high seas. The pirates are heavily armed with automatic weapons and grenade launchers. They clamber aboard from high-speed skiffs tended by a mother craft using grappling hooks. A well-armed crew, however, using automatic weapons, including mounted 50-cal. machine guns and other available technology such as sound concentration devices and laser weapons could repel or discourage the boarders, at some risk, of course. But life is full of risks and sooner or later, action is required to protect and property and prevent hostage taking. The arguments against arming the crews and equipping their ships with defensive weapons as was done during WW II are familiar but, in my view, unpersuasive. They include the argument that the pirates only want the ransom money and that the ships, cargoes and crews are usually returned unharmed. The school bully only wanted your lunch money, too. The Mexican drug cartels only want to make a living, too. Why provoke them? Shipping companies and their insurers have thus far acted as if these acts of piracy were mere inconveniences and a cost of doing business. Other arguments cite the fact that merchant crews are not combatants and their unions object to arming them. Fine. Hire security detachments. Others cite restrictions imposed by other countries against allowing ships with armed crews into their ports. Still others warn of the danger of firearms igniting volatile cargoes. There are risks associated with armed solutions, of course. If the shippers and insurers aren’t willing to take some risk, they can just continue to pay the ransoms and hope for the best. Here’s the reality. Pirates will grow bolder as long as the ransoms are paid. They will demand more profit to compensate for the increased risk. There are alternatives to firearms. Sound concentration devices and laser weapons could disable pirates before they board. There are other defensive measures they could take to prevent boarding but they require some degree of assertiveness. Navies can’t be everywhere at once and the Somali coast is almost as long as the west coast of the United States. The attack on the Maersk Alabama was a game-changer. It was the first pirate attack on a U.S. flag ship since the Barbarry Coast days. The United States does not pay ransoms to pirates. A ship flying the U.S. flag is a piece of sovereign territory and an attack on it is an act of war, not merely a criminal act as a giggling Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put it recently. Since lawless Somalia, a failed state without a functioning government, obviously can’t control the pirates, the U.S. has every right to order a naval quarantine of Somali ports and pirate sanctuaries as we did on the Barbary Coast long ago at a time when we were actually willing to assert our rights and freedom to navigate the seas. Sadly, that courage and resolve has been replaced by a willingness to compromise, even where our vital interests are at stake, and to avoid force at all cost, a condition that has always preceded the decline of the world’s great powers. Copyright 2009 by J. F. Kelly, Jr. Dr. Kelly is a retired Navy Captain and bank senior vice-president. A veteran of over thirty years of naval service, he commanded three ships and the Navy Personnel Research and Development Center in San Diego. He joined Great American Bank in 1983, serving first as Training and Development Director and later as Director of Human Resources. He retired from the bank in 1994 and has since devoted his efforts to community services. He served as foreman of the San Diego County Grand Jury in 1997-1998, president of the Lions Club of San Diego, the San Diego Council of the Navy League of the United States, the Lions Foundation, the Boys and Girls Foundation, Vice-president of the City of San Diego Salary setting commission and as chairman of the Business Council of the San Diego County Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Task Force. He currently serves on the board of the Boys and Girls Foundation and the Coronado Roundtable. He currently teaches ship handling, seamanship and navigation at the Naval Base, San Diego. A freelance writer, his weekly column on current events appears in the California Republic, the Coronado EagleJournal, eCoronado.com and other publications. Dr. Kelly has degrees in education, management and leadership including a doctor of education degree from the University of San Diego. He and his wife, the former Charlane Hughes, reside in Coronado.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Coronado Times Staff
Coronado Times Staff
Have news to share? Send tips, story ideas or letters to the editor to: [email protected]

More Local News